|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Doctor Penguin
Amarr
Imperial Academy
   |
Posted - 2008.11.14 22:41:00 -
[1]
This thread is STILL GOING?
Sheesh. It's a game. It's not worth spending your time here mindlessly mashing out Why CCP is wrong: Part CXIV
________________________________________________
|
Doctor Penguin
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2008.11.21 10:30:00 -
[2]
Face it you twits, you've lost.
I agree with the chap that said that he didn't care that CCP had "lied" to him. If your so mentally insecure as for that to bother you, I'd advise seeing a shrink about a bad case of irrational paranoia.
Pay or leave.
________________________________________________
|
Doctor Penguin
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2008.11.21 17:05:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Doctor Penguin on 21/11/2008 17:04:58
Midias: Straw Man arguement.
Person A: X is a good idea.
Peson B: I say that Y is like X, but Y is percieved to be bad. As you support X, you must support Y.
Sorry mate, that's not how it works in the real world. |
Doctor Penguin
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2008.11.21 20:17:00 -
[4]
I also don't rise to the bait of people calling me a dumbass. If slinging insults is your first line of defence for those who critique , I think all that does is points out the obvious - the people who are whining on this thread are twits.
Now, I know you want a good arguement, but in all honesty, I think that you badly need to sit down and contemplate the value of continuing this discussion.
Also, wikipedia disagrees with you. A straw man arguement...
 Quote:
is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "set up a straw man," one describes a position that superficially resembles an opponent's actual view, yet is easier to refute. Then, one attributes that position to the opponent. For example, someone might deliberately overstate the opponent's position. While a straw man argument may work as a rhetorical techniquełand succeed in persuading peoplełit carries little or no real evidential weight, since the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.
As in, if I say X and you link X to Y (Y representing a "bad thing" and then attack me for supporting Y, you are misrepresenting my opinion.
Seriously. See a shrink, unless you're just sitting in this thread slicing your wrists and chucking the blood at those that dare argue at your opinion.
________________________________________________
|
Doctor Penguin
Amarr
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2008.11.22 11:26:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Doctor Penguin on 22/11/2008 11:26:33
Originally by: Squirrrel
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone...
You're a hypocrite.
Nope, because twit is about as offending as calling somebody a carrot.
Now, if you'll stop dismissing my arguement because I'm so obviously more idiotic than you, then you might understand that my arguement was that it's bloody sad to sit on this thread crying into your cup of emo. Get over it. 
PS: Above Whiner: Starting said rebuttal with dumbass. Nice.
________________________________________________
|
Doctor Penguin
Amarr
Shadow Command
Tenth Legion
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 13:09:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Doctor Penguin on 16/03/2009 13:09:43
...
This thread is still going? You sad, sad people.  It's been like 7 months or something.
________________________________________________
http://eve.drome.nl/CaodCleaner/ Help make CAOD readable. |
|
|
| |
|